
I know that i have a bad habit that may lead to misunderstanding. Reading Thinking Technique by Ainon she revealed why Azharian are so good at debating and yet i agree with her that many Ustaz are good at debating good at accusing people yet no invention only debating that lead to ungood relation between Embassy. students. and groups. Ainon revealed in her book that this technique of debating was influenced by greek style thought during the english coming in Egypt so why u ca nsee the indian people are good at debating contras to japanese or chinese people.....if you dont believe just look at malaysia the most prominent peguam is a nindian and the jumlah is high ......you can see many philosophy but could greek produce invention like tyres or lamp....the answer is no! They only analyzing the past when we look at past we can come with many analysis.
But yet looking at past is useful or i name it critical thinking. Crtitical thinking usually end up with critique. It is good but not really good without invention we need to correct the wrong and then invent new.
So the concluion here is critical style thinking is really contras to lateral style thinking but both are really supporting each other.
Some ideas that ruined my brain. We must read with teachers for afraid of sesat. Do not read alone because you might fall into darkness atheism...kah4! You know why malay is so bad they have no habit of reading but you came with idea that reading along are not good......so how we can move?
Second idea that i am ustaz or ulamak so when i ask something they say i have no capasity. Yes i agree that ustaz and ulamak have the ilm but whats my wrong when i ask question they just answer like that....do i doing wrong thing for ask the person in authority.......???
I really like TGNA.....may be continue............
caaution: be aware i donot state that critical thingkin is no use but it must be balanced by invention thhinking or lateral thinking
No comments:
Post a Comment